V: Therapeutic strategies, prognosis and follow-up (Table 2 to 6)
Histopathological diagnosis determines the various treatment orientations. A search for tumour markers in the CSF and blood must be carried out for secreting germ cell tumours. A rise in the marker levels (alpha foeto protein and/or beta hCG) allows the diagnosis of an extra embryonal tumour cell population: chemotherapy will therefore be used first. For all other cases biopsy (see above) or direct surgical approach are mandatory.
Pineal cysts of the pineal region
An asymptomatic cyst must not be resected. A cyst with symptoms of compression needs a CSF shunt. If the size and the symptoms increase, tumour resection is performed.
Pineal parenchymal tumours
Tumour resection is the treatment of choice, with very low morbity and mortality in expert hands in the past decade, in our large series.
For grade I (pineocytoma) surgery is the only treatment modality.
For grades II and III (PPT int) tumour resection is completed by post-operative radiotherapy. For grade II tumours focal conformal radiotherapy is necessary (up to a total dose of 54 Gy with classical fractionation). For grade III tumours extensive field treatment associates focal conformal radiotherapy of the pineal region tumour (54 Gy total dose) and whole spinal cord irradiation (36 Gy total dose). Prognosis differs with grade. Failures, are usually delayed (median = 13 years) and local for grade II tumours. They are more frequent for grade III tumours and in a shorter time (median = 6 years). They appear at the primary site and/or as spinal seeding [64].
Progression free survival and 15 years crude survival are respectively 40% and 53% for grade II tumours, and for grade III tumours 26% and 36% [64].
Pineoblastoma remains a therapeutic challenge. Its treatment is still the aim of different clinical phase I and II trials. Routine treatment combination is based on surgical resection, heavy chemotherapy regimen, and extensive field radiotherapy. Despite the treatment load, failures occur in 80% of cases with a worse prognosis for young patients [59, 64]. These failures occur at the primary or as seeding along the spinal cord or in bones [59,64,66]. The progression free survival is 20 % at 60 months and the median crude survival at 5 years is 20% and 0% at ten years [64]. All study failed to demonstrate any benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy [59, 67]. The most recent non randomized study in children [67] comprised few cases (14, 21%) of pineal among supra-tentorial PNET(68 cases), without central pathological review, called pineoblastoma. Surprisingly, the 5 years OS and EFS in this study for these 14 cases was 41%. An explanation of this good survival in infant and children, like in the randomly treated population in Jakacki publication ten years before, is probably due to some grade 3 PPT tumours or other histopathological tumours.
Glial tumours
Pilocytic astrocytoma
Surgery is the main treatment. If resection is incomplete there is no role for radiotherapy unless the remaining tumour grows again and if no second surgery is advisable.
Infiltrating astrocytic or oligodendroglial glioma
Surgery is advised and completed by focal radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to grade and histological type.
Ependymal tumours
They need complete surgery when feasible followed by focal radiotherapy for high grade tumours.
Papillary tumours of the pineal region (PTPR)
Surgery is advised and followed by 50 Gy focal radiation treatment [40-41] given the high risk of local recurrence with surgery alone or surgery plus chemotherapy [personal communication 2007], (fig. 7-8). In our series gross total resection was the only clinical factor that tended to be associated with overall survival and recurrence (p = 0.10 and p = 0.16, respectively) but the correlation failed to achieve statistical significance. Due to the rarity of these tumors, data on the prognostic value of PTPR remain scarce. Kaplan-Meier analysis of our series provided 5-year estimates for overall survival and progression-free survival of 73% and 27% [40].
Germ cell tumours
Histopathology is the main criterion for the therapeutic strategy [68].
Pure germinoma (αFP< 25 ng/mL ; βHCG < 50 IU/L in the serum and CSF ). No resection surgery is advisable. Biopsy only is mandatory (see above for modes of biopsy). For uni or bifocal tumours (supra-sellar and pineal region tumours) the standard treatment is craniospinal radiotherapy at 24 Gy total dose followed by a boost of 16 to 19 Gy focal radiotherapy on the initial tumour site (s).
Recent studies attempt to reduce the irradiated volume and the potential late delayed radiation neuropsychological sequelae by using post-operative first line chemotherapy. However, despite a major complete response rate to chemotherapy of 85% a high level of morbidity and of an early unacceptable recurrence level above 50% have been registered [68]. The evidence suggests that as smaller radiotherapy volume is used, recurrence rates increased: 2.3% after craniospinal irradiation; 7.6% after whole brain or ventricle irradiation; 23.3% after localised irradiation [73]. The question remains about how to define the most appropriate radiation volumes and the minimal doses needed to maintain the excellent results of cranio-spinal radiotherapy alone which gives a global survival and recurrence free survival of 97% in localised disease. The last trial of the SFOP (Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique) and the B arm of the SIOP (Societe Internationale d’Oncologie Pédiatrique) study in progress examine the possibility of limiting the radiation target to the tumour site at a 40 Gy total dose after 4 cycles of Carboplatin based chemotherapy (see above). Analysis of recent results shows respectively for each study a recurrence level of 16.4% and 14% with a median follow up of 76 and 24 months [69-72].These failures may be late delayed: the median time for recurrence is 36 months in the SFOP trial. The analysis of the dose/volume relationship reveals that the majority of the failures are localized within the ventricles and in particular in the posterior and anterior cornu. Similar results are reported in the literature: median time to recurrence of 15.5% with chemotherapy and only focal radiotherapy of the tumour site versus 3.8% with exclusive cranio-spinal radiotherapy [72]. Overview of the recurrence sites demonstrates that failures after chemotherapy and focal radiotherapy are mainly ventricular: a systematic radiotherapy of the whole brain and total neuraxis is therefore not necessary. These results led SIOP to propose for its protocol chemotherapy combined with 24 Gy radiotherapy to the tumour site and the ventricles. If complete remission is observed after chemotherapy no complementary dose is delivered to the tumour site beyond 24 Gy as is the case for Japanese studies [74-75]. When there is still an objective tumour remnant at the end of chemotherapy, the total dose to the initial tumour site is 40 Gy. Published data lead to the recommendation of 24 Gy to the ventricles and 40-45 Gy to the tumour site when the patient is a child not involved in a clinical research study. Survival in children is 98% at 3 years [60]. The protocol for adult patients of the ANOCEF (Association de Neuro-oncologie d’Expression Française ; French Neuro-oncology Study Group) recommends after chemotherapy-induced complete remission 24 Gy radiotherapy limited to the third ventricle.
In all, we retain that:
- for the coming clinical trials, prospective analysis of late delayed cognitive sequelae at ten years is necessary;
- if no response (stable disease or progression) to first line chemotherapy is observed the diagnosis of germinoma based on biopsy must be reconsidered and a tumour removal performed.
A multifocal disease and/or a neuraxis spread ( diagnosed on ventriculo-cisternostomy biopsy or on brain or spinal cord NMR imaging or on CSF cytology) are treated with 24 Gy craniospinal radiotherapy completed by a 16 Gy boost on the initial tumour sites (primitive and metastatic). In cases treated with radiotherapy only, the results are identical to those obtained for localized forms: first line chemotherapy treatment becomes debatable.
Marker secreting pineal region germ cell tumours
First line chemotherapy treatment is used (see above). If at the end of the chemotherapy protocol complete response is not obtained, resection surgery must be performed for a mature or immature teratoma remnant.
When the response is complete, either after chemotherapy alone, or chemotherapy followed by surgery, focal and conformal radiotherapy of the initial growth tumour volume remains useful at a 54 Gy total dose (30 fractions).
Bad prognosis patients with marker secreting tumours (multifocal disease, brain and or neuraxis spread, tumour markers at a high level alpha foetoprotein more than 1000ng/ml) will be treated in the protocol with high dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow rescue to improve survival. Radiotherapy is added at the end of the chemotherapy protocol according to the following rules: craniospinal irradiation at 24 Gy and boost(s) up to 54 Gy on the initial tumour sites if possible.
Mature and immature teratoma
Complete resection surgery is the aim of treatment. If an immature component is found at histopathology the post-operative treatment will be the same as the one used for secreting germ cell tumours.
Conclusion
The pineal region includes various tumour entities. Diagnosis and treatment of these tumours necessitate a multidisciplinary approach and an expert team, given the paucity of these tumours and the number of pitfalls at each step of management.
Our work is in progress to improve the knowledge about these tumours.
Expert Commentary and Five year view
Pineal tumours are rare and deserve national and international cooperation. A multicentric international cooperative study group is necessary, which could lead to a collection of clinical data and biological material, and promote clinical trials.
A systematic histological review is recommended given the variety of tumours and the possible pitfalls of diagnosis.
Direct surgical approach is often the treatment of choice: when necessary, patients have to be addressed to reference neurosurgery departments, given potential morbidity.
Many clinical trials are needed for chemo and radiosensitive tumours, and pineoblastomas.
For germinomas the role of radiotherapy has to be minimized in children to avoid neurocognitive consequences. Chemotherapy morbidity must be clearly evaluated in these patients. For adults chemotherapy has to be avoided or studied in randomized trials and compared to radiotherapy alone.
Bad prognosis secreting germ cell tumours require a precise evaluation of dose intense chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue. The definition of the most adequate radiotherapy doses and target volumes remains open.
Pineoblastoma patients are potential candidates for targeted therapies to improve the progression free interval and the overall survival: phase two studies must be systematic given the grim results obtained to date.
References:
1- Jouvet A, Saint-Pierre G, Fauchon F, et al. M. Pineal parenchymal tumors: a correlation of histological features with prognosis in 66 cases.Brain Pathol 2000; 10: 49-60
2- Mena H, Nakazano Y, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW. Pineal parenchymal tumours. In : Kleihues P, Cavanee WK eds. Pathology and Genetics Tumours of the Nervous system. Lyon : IARC Press, 2000, Vol 7 : 115-121
3- Moller M. Introduction to mammalian pineal innervation. Microsc Res Tech 1999; 46: 235-8
4- Claustrat B, Geoffriau M, Brun J, Chazot G. [Melatonin in humans: a biochemical marker of the circadian clock and an endogenous synchronizer]. Neurophysiol Clin 1995; 25: 351-9
5- Arendt J. Melatonin and the pineal gland: influence on mammalian seasonal and circadian physiology. Rev Reprod 1998; 3: 13-22
6- Klein P, Rubinstein LJ. Benign symptomatic glial cysts of the pineal gland: a report of seven cases and review of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 991-5
7- Oeckler R, Feiden W. Benign symptomatic lesions of the pineal gland. Report of seven cases treated surgically. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 108: 40-4.
8- Fain JS, Tomlinson FH, Scheithauer BW et al. Symptomatic glial cysts of the pineal gland. J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 454-60.
9- Fleege MA, Miller GM, Fletcher GP, Fain JS, Scheithauer BW. Benign glial cysts of the pineal gland: unusual imaging characteristics with histologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 161-6.
10- Mena H, Armonda RA, Ribas JL, Ondra SL, Rushing EJ. Nonneoplastic pineal cysts: a clinicopathologic study of twenty-one cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 1997; 1: 11-8.
11- Vallee B, Meriot P, Person H, Rodriguez V, Sidhamed S, Dam Hieu P. Benign glial cysts of the pineal region. Neurochirurgie 1997; 43: 299-302.
12- Engel U, Gottschalk S, Niehaus L, et al. Cystic lesions of the pineal region--MRI and pathology. Neuroradiology 2000; 42: 399-402.
13- McNeely PD, Howes WJ, Mehta V. Pineal apoplexy: is it a facilitator for the development of pineal cysts? Can J Neurol Sci 2003; 30: 67-71.
14- Jouvet A, Fevre-Montange M, Besancon R, et al. Structural and ultrastructural characteristics of human pineal gland, and pineal parenchymal tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1994; 88: 334-48.
15- DeGirolami U, Zvaigzne O. Modification of the Achucarro-Hortega pineal stain for paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissue. Stain Technol 1973; 48: 48-50
16- Borit A, Blackwood W, Mair WG. The separation of pineocytoma from pineoblastoma. Cancer 1980; 45: 1408-18
17- Hirato J, Nakazato Y. Pathology of pineal region tumors. J Neurooncol 2001; 54: 239-49
18- Schild SE, Scheithauer BW, Schomberg PJ et al. Pineal parenchymal tumors. Clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic aspects. Cancer 1993; 72: 870-80
19- Kuchelmeister K, von Borcke IM, Klein H, Bergmann M, Gullotta F. Pleomorphic pineocytoma with extensive neuronal differentiation: report of two cases. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1994; 88: 448-53
20- Numoto RT. Pineal parenchymal tumors: cell differentiation and prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1994; 120: 683-90
21- Korf HW, Klein DC, Zigler JS, Gery I, Schachenmayr W. S-antigen-like immunoreactivity in a human pineocytoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1986; 69: 165-7
22- Perentes E, Rubinstein LJ, Herman MM, Donoso LA. S-antigen immunoreactivity in human pineal glands and pineal parenchymal tumors. A monoclonal antibody study. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1986; 71: 224-7.
23- Lopes MB, Gonzalez-Fernandez F, Scheithauer BW, VandenBerg SR. Differential expression of retinal proteins in a pineal parenchymal tumor. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1993; 52: 516-24
24- Mena H, Rushing EJ, Ribas JL, Delahunt B, McCarthy WF. Tumors of pineal parenchymal cells: a correlation of histological features, including nucleolar organizer regions, with survival in 35 cases. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 20-30
25- Fevre-Montange M, Jouvet A, Privat K, et al. Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, biochemical and in vitro studies of a pineocytoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1998; 95: 532-9
26- Barber SG, Smith JA, Hughes RC. Melatonin as a tumour marker in a patient with pineal tumour. Br Med J 1978; 2: 328
27- Hassoun J, Devictor B, Gambarelli D, Peragut JC, Toga M. Paired twisted filaments: a new ultrastructural marker of human pinealomas? Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1984; 65: 163-5
28- Paulino AC. Trilateral retinoblastoma: is the location of the intracranial tumor important? Cancer 1999; 86: 135-41
29- Amoaku WM, Willshaw HE, Parkes SE, Shah KJ, Mann JR. Trilateral retinoblastoma. A report of five patients. Cancer 1996; 78: 858-63.
30- Moll AC, Imhof SM, Schouten-Van Meeteren AY, Boers M. Screening for pineoblastoma in patients with retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 1774; author reply 1774.
31- Markesbery WR, Haugh RM, Young AB. Ultrastructure of pineal parenchymal neoplasms. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1981; 55: 143-9.
32- Kline KT, Damjanov I, Katz SM, Schmidek H. Pineoblastoma: an electron microscopic study. Cancer 1979; 44: 1692-9.
33- Min KW, Scheithauer BW, Bauserman SC. Pineal parenchymal tumors: an ultrastructural study with prognostic implications. Ultrastruct Pathol 1994; 18: 69-85.
34- Lapras C, Bognar L, Turjman F, et al. Tectal plate gliomas. Part I: Microsurgery of the tectal plate gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 126: 76-83.
35- Gasparetto EL, Warszawiak D, Adam GP, Bleggi-Torres LF, de Carvalho Neto A. Glioblastoma multiforme of the pineal region: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003; 61: 468-72.
36- Nitta J, Tada T, Kyoshima K, et al. Atypical pleomorphic astrocytoma in the pineal gland: case report. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 1458-60; discussion 1460-1.
37- Hunt SJ, Johnson PC. Melanotic ganglioglioma of the pineal region. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1989; 79: 222-5.
38- Faillot T, Sichez JP, Capelle L, Kujas M, Fohanno D. Ganglioglioma of the pineal region: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1998; 49: 104-7; discussion 107-8.
39- Jouvet A, Fauchon F, Liberski P, et al. M. Papillary tumor of the pineal region. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 505-12.
40- Fèvre-Montange M, Hasselblatt M, Figarella-Branger D. et al. Prognosis and histopathologic features in papillary tumors of the pineal region : a retrospective multicenter study of 31 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neuro 2006;65: 1004-1011
41-Kuchelmeister K, Hügens-Penzel M, Jödicke A,
Schachenmayr W. Papillary tumour of the pineal region: histodiagnostic considerations
42- Dagnew E, Langford L, Lang F, DeMonte F, Papillary tumors of the pineal region: case report. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 953-955.
43- Nakano I, Kondo A, Iwasaki K. Choroid plexus papilloma in the posterior third ventricle: case report. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 1279-82.
44- Kroppenstedt SN, Golfinos J, Sonntag VK, Spetzler RF. Pineal region lesion masquerading choroid plexus papilloma: case report. Surg Neurol 2003; 59: 124-7; discussion 127.
45- Ho DM, Liu HC. Primary intracranial germ cell tumor. Pathologic study of 51 patients. Cancer 1992; 70: 1577-84.
46- Jennings MT, Gelman R, Hochberg F. Intracranial germ-cell tumors: natural history and pathogenesis. J Neurosurg 1985; 63: 155-67.
47- Matsutani M, Sano K, Takakura K, et al. Primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a clinical analysis of 153 histologically verified cases. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 446-55.
48- Jouvet A, Labrousse F: Les tumeurs germinales intracrâniennes, Académie Internationale de Pathologie, Vol 13, 73-81,1991.
49- Rosemblum MK, Matstani M, Van Meir EG. CNS germ cell tumors. In : Kleihues P, Cavanee WK eds. Pathology and Genetics Tumours of the Nervous system. Lyon : IARC Press, 2000, 207-214.
50-Felix I, Becker LE. Intracranial germ cell tumors in children: an immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990; 16: 156-62.
51-Takeshima H., Kaji M., Uchida H., Hirano H., Kuratsu J. Expression and distribution of c-kit receptor and its ligand in human CNS germ cell tumors: a useful histological marker for the diagnosis of germinoma. Brain Tumor Pathol 2004; 21(1): 13-6.
52- Bjornsson J, Scheithauer BW, Okazaki H, Leech RW. Intracranial germ cell tumors: pathobiological and immunohistochemical aspects of 70 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1985; 44: 32-46.
53- Nakamura M, Saeki N, Iwadate Y, Sunami K, Osato K, Yamaura A. Neuroradiological characteristics of pineocytoma and pineoblastoma. Neuroradiology 2000; 42: 509-14.
54- Kreth FW, Schatz CR, Pagenstecher A, Faist M, Volk B, Ostertag CB. Stereotactic management of lesions of the pineal region. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 280-9; discussion 289-91.
55- Regis J, Bouillot P, Rouby-Volot F, Figarella-Branger D, Dufour H, Peragut JC. Pineal region tumors and the role of stereotactic biopsy: review of the mortality, morbidity, and diagnostic rates in 370 cases. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 907-12.
56- Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI. Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol 2003; 59: 250-68.
57- Lapras C, Patet JD, Mottolese C, Lapras C, Jr. Direct surgery for pineal tumors: occipital-transtentorial approach. Prog Exp Tumor Res 1987; 30: 268-80
58- Brotchi J, Raftopoulos C, Levivier M, et al. Lesions of the pineal and tentorial region. Occipito-parietal approach in three-quarter prone position with infrasagittal craniotomy. Neurochirurgie 1991; 37: 410-415.
59- Jakacki RI, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JMet al. Survival and prognostic factors following radiation and/or chemotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the pineal region in infants and children: a report of the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1377-83
60- Bouffet E, Baranzelli MC, Patte C, et al. Combined treatment modality for intracranial germinomas: results of a multicentre SFOP experience. Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique. Br J Cancer 1999; 79: 1199-204
61- Capra M, Hargrave D, Bartels U, Hyder D, Huang A, Bouffet E. Central nervous system tumours in adolescents. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2643-50
62- Baranzelli MC, Patte C, Bouffet E, et al. Nonmetastatic intracranial germinoma: the experience of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. Cancer 1997; 80: 1792-7
63- Baranzelli MC, Patte C, Bouffet E, Portas M, et al. An attempt to treat pediatric intracranial alphaFP and betaHCG secreting germ cell tumors with chemotherapy alone. SFOP experience with 18 cases. Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique. J Neurooncol 1998; 37: 229-39
64- Fauchon F, Jouvet A, Paquis P, et al. Parenchymal pineal tumors: a clinicopathological study of 76 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 959-68
65- Lutterbach J, Fauchon F, Schild SE, et al. Malignant pineal parenchymal tumors in adult patients: patterns of care and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 44-55
66- Charafe-Jauffret E, Lehmann G, Fauchon F, et al. Vertebral metastases from pineoblastoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125: 939-43
67- Pizer B., Weston C., Robinson. et al. Analysis of patients with supratentorial primitive neuro-ectodermal tumours entered into SIOP/UKCCSG PNET 3 study. European J Canc 2006; 42:1120-1128.
68- Schild SE, Scheithauer BW, Haddock MG, et al. Histologically confirmed pineal tumors and other germ cell tumors of the brain. Cancer 1996; 78: 2564-71
69- Balmaceda C, Heller G, Rosenblum M, et al. Chemotherapy without irradiation-a novel approach for newly diagnosed CNS germ cell tumors: results of an international cooperative trial. The First International Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol, 1996; 14:2908-2915.
70- Alapetite C, Carrie C, Brisse H, et al., on behalf of the SFOP (Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique. Patterns of relapse following Carboplatin-based chemotherapy and focal irradiation of Intracranial germinoma : the SFOP experience. Neuro-Oncology, 5, 25, 2003.
71- Alapetite C, Carrie C, Brisse H, et al. on behalf of the SFOP. Patterns of relapse following focal irradiation of intracranial germinoma: critical review of TGM-TC90 SFOP protocol. In Germ Cell Tumors V, ed. P. Harnden, J.K. Joffe, W.G. Jones, Springer, 132, 2002.
72- Alapetite C, Ricardi U, Saran F, et al. Wholeventricular irradiation in combination with chemotherapy in intracranial germinoma: the consensus of the SIOP CNS GCT study group. Med. Pediatr. Oncol., 39, 248, 2002.
73- Rogers S., Mosleh-Shirazi M., Saran F. Radiotherapy of localised intracranial germinoma: time to sever historical ties? Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:509-19.
74- Matsutani M; Japanese Pediatric Brain Tumor Study Group.Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for CNS germ cell tumors--the Japanese experience.
J Neurooncol. 2001 Sep; 54(3):311-6.
75- Aoyama H, Shirato H, Ikeda J, Fujieda K, Miyasaka K, Sawamura Y. Induction chemotherapy followed by low-dose involved-field radiotherapy for intracranial germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1; 20(3):857-65. |